bài 1:

Many people feel that it's more likely for kids to choose their favorite field than force them to learn all of kids having into school. I totally agree that children should be decided the subjects they like to study because of the high quality in the learning process and the positive status in their psychology.
First of all, choosing the most-liked subject will help students to be more enthusiam about finishing the homework and listening teacher's the lesson. As a result, their score will be higher that encourage them on continuing to try to do the best while doing excercises. Besides, they will be in honor of their results that makes them to absorb knowledge easier and more advantageous. For example, in 1970, the research of Neal Koblitz pointed that the result in the final test of the class which included students chose their interesting subjects was higher than students who must work on all of compulsory subjects.
One more, the child's psychology can be affected negatively if people force them to learn difficult subjects that they are dislike. Nowadays, the suicide rate of developing and developed coutries's children is rapidly increase because of the huge budget of compulsory subjects at the school. To illustrate, in 2012, according to the investigate of Blum et al, the researchers informed that countries where concentrated on obligatory fields had the percentage of the student destroying themself more serious than nations where children could choose their interesting majors. Especially, the proportion of Chinese, South Korean and Vietnamese kids committing suicide accounted for 17 percent, 8.1 percent and 2.3 percent, respectively.
In conclusion, I completely agree that goverment should give children permission choose their favorite subjects to study in order to creating the useful studying environment and avoiding the negative effect on students.

bài 2:

Nowadays, schools have become increasingly more important for students than ever before. Surprisingly, they notice that some topics school taught are very difficult like Math or Physic. Recommending these be alternative instead of mandatory. So in this essay, I will consider both sides of the question and give my own view.

To begin with, there are 2 main reasons to change these subjects into non-compulsory. Firstly, it is clear that subjects can be extremely difficult for a couple of students. Those who can excel most courses but only struggle the rest. As a result, they will have a really hard time trying to catch up with others. Furthermore, some lessons we learn at school may not be very useful. For instance, people who spent several years studying Physic just to have a degree don't know how to apply it to real life.

However, there are still 2 noticeable disadvantages when trying to make these subjects voluntary. The first reason is they are impossible to be replaced. Subjects like Math or Physic have been in school for centuries and changing the current school system is unthinkable. Rather than changing entirely, certain schools can only change the amount of content being taught. Secondly, those subjects are requirements to get a promising career. Without them, the employment rates can drastically decrease in some businesses.

Overall, while there are some advantages to make the change, the drawbacks outweighed it. Personally, I will choose not to adjust the current subjects because of the handicaps that it has.

Trả lời:

I disagree because these subjects are so important to the future of young people. Without knowledge of these subjects, young people will not be successful in the future because these subjects are part of life. Without math, the kids wouldn't know how to calculate, but once they didn't know how to calculate it would be difficult to do anything. If you do not learn philosophy, you will not know anything about this society, the children are like frogs at the bottom of the well, forever ignorant of life. So in my opinion children have to learn math and philosophy.

XIN TLHN VÀ * NHÉ